Still recruiting?

34 posts / 0 new
Last post
Dallers
Offline
Last seen: 14 years 2 months ago

SAS_Smart my sincere apologies that i disagreed with you if i had seen the ALMIGHTY Signature you had i would have never questioned your reply :? Lol

But still...... only joking Blum 3

If a million people say a foolish thing, it is still a foolish thing. Anatole France [Jacques Anatole Thibault] (1844-1924)

Spidey01
Offline
Last seen: 4 years 6 months ago

To be honest, all you should need is the quivulent to a common off the rack PC ($400-$750 in my area) and upgrade to a decent graphics card ($40-$80) and even then if your box comes with a nVidia or ATI card rather then Intel IGD you could probably 'make due'.

I've always had a game box fairly up to 'par' with the average PC but have never needed to get eye-popping gfx for friends Wink

Cougar
Offline
Last seen: 3 years 9 months ago

THOUGHT:

SAS has done a very successful job of creating a SpecOps Team.

I, back in the 60's, participated as Opfor and Indigenous Allies member for Special Forces training. We fought like VC/partisans. Our style was different than the Special Forces units.

I don't see any reason that SAS could not create a Red Cell of terrorists who "win" by doing what a terrorist would do. Objectives could be set by different tango ROE's to represent, for example Jihadists or Italian Communists. A game-square approach to scoring would inhibit premature termination of hostages but require it as a last resort, giving commensurate scores to the tangos. This would require the terrorist individuals to make decisions based on their subjective interpretation of the situation with weight towards completion of their goal (which the SAS team might know none, some or all of) and termination of hostages being a last ditch effort to salvage a total loss. For that matter the terrorists could throw a die and refer to a mission table to decide what to do with % weights given to the roll according to their known mission orders. This could be done individually before the mission so that no terrorist knows what his partners will do (unless they make another roll based on their knowledge/experience together in combat) Rotation into the Red Cell could sharpen a members understanding of terrorist tactics and mindset. The biggest pay-off would be the increased difficulty of playing against human targets and the opportunity to use that human character against them. I'm sure that you could create an appropriately disciplined Opfor using experienced SAS members. I'm not sure I've seen another clan that could do this, but I believe SAS is capable of doing it well.

Oh, yes, since the terrorists would operate under scenario specific pseudonyms, you wouldn't even know who you were playing against even if you knew the individual members of the Red Cell.

IMAGE(http://miniprofile.xfire.com/bg/sh/type/0/slack911.png) aka Slack911, yamaraion, M827_CSM_COUGAR,Cougar]

Pages